Back to the RadioSpace™ home page


NewsDirect story topics:

Consumer, Business & General Interest

Current Events & Public Affairs

Entertainment & Sports

Health & Medicine


While One Fuel-Economy Proposal in Congress May Go Too Far, Another May Be a Lot More Reasonable

bocina.gif (3353 bytes)
Fully produced report in MP3 format:
48 kbps | 96 kbps
(47 seconds)


-- How Will You Use This Story? --


(OPEN):
THE U-S SENATE WILL VOTE ON FUEL-ECONOMY LEGISLATION WITHIN THE NEXT FEW DAYS.  EVERYONE AGREES THAT BETTER GAS MILEAGE HELPS THE ENVIRONMENT, AND OUR POCKETBOOKS.  BUT, ONE SENATE BILL MAY GO TO THE EXTREME.  FORMER U-S SENATOR JIM TALENT, FROM MISSOURI, EXPLAINS WHY AN AGGRESSIVE, COMPROMISE BILL IS MORE REASONABLE...

(TALENT):
"
H-R SIX CALLS FOR AN AVERAGE 52 MILES PER GALLON--A STANDARD SO EXTREME [THAT] NOT A SINGLE AUTOMAKER CAN MEET IT.  THE BILL NOT ONLY HURTS DETROIT; IT WILL HURT AUTO JOBS IN MISSOURI, TENNESSEE, AND WISCONSIN--AS WELL AS DEALERS AND SUPPLIERS, NATIONWIDE.
"

(BRIDGE):
TALENT ADVOCATES A COMPROMISE BILL...

(TALENT):
"
THE LEVIN-BOND AMENDMENT IS AGGRESSIVE--BUT REASONABLE:  IT RAISES STANDARDS FOR CARS TO 36 MILES PER GALLON.  IT PROTECTS AMERICAN AUTO JOBS--AND REQUIRES ENERGY-EFFICIENT TECHNOLOGIES, LIKE HYBRIDS.  THIS AMENDMENT IS TOUGH--BUT IT DOESN'T RUN THE CAR COMPANIES OUT OF BUSINESS.
"



Copyright © 2007 North American Network, Inc.

Listings and resources:

Programming Resources

About RadioSpace

Audio Tips

Search

Free NewsDirect Subscription


Webmaster E-Mail